Biotech diligence · updated 13 September 2026
Biotech due-diligence document gathering: coverage across 11 companies
Before an investor or a partner commits money to a biotech company, someone gathers everything the company has published: investor decks, regulatory filings, drug labels, research papers and clinical trial records. This is part of due diligence, the checking done before a deal. By hand, it falls to an analyst, one search and one download at a time.
We gave this job to an AI research run for 11 biotech companies. Before each run there was a checklist of what should be found, and we scored each run by how much of that checklist it covered.
5 of the 11 runs found everything on the checklist. The other 6 found at least 94%. Every file a run cited was really saved and not empty.
- Companies
- 11
- Time, all runs
- 191m 32s
- Text read (tokens)
- 55.92M
- Text written (tokens)
- 242k
What a research run is
hedwigai makes workbooks: documents such as reports, trackers and lists that AI research runs write and keep current.
A research run is an AI agent given one piece of work, here “gather this company's diligence documents”. It searches the web, opens and reads what it finds, saves the documents, and writes the workbook: a checklist of what it found and a short memo.
The seven kinds of document every run looks for
The checklist is built from the same seven kinds of document for every company.
- 01
Investor presentations
the decks on the company's own investor page
- 02
Website literature and posters
every paper and poster the company links from its site
- 03
Annual and quarterly reports (10-K and 10-Q)
the reports a US-listed company files with the regulator each year and each quarter — or the 20-F and 6-K, which a foreign company files instead
- 04
The company's own drug labels
the official prescribing information for each approved product, where there is one
- 05
Competitors' drug labels
the labels for the competing products, and for the treatment doctors use today (the standard of care)
- 06
Published research
a search of PubMed and Google Scholar for papers on the company's products, and on other products that treat the same disease or work the same way
- 07
Clinical trial registry entries
every study on the company's products listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, the public registry of clinical trials
How much each run found
Coverage is the share of the checklist a run actually covered, from 0 (nothing) to 1 (everything). The companies are not named. Each is described by its kind, because the kind decides how much there is to find. The dashed line marks 0.95, the score we aim for.
- Average coverage 0.971.
- 5 of 11 at or above 0.95.
- Quality 1.000 on every one of the eleven. Quality is a second score: of the files a run says it saved, the share that are really saved and not empty. 260 cited files were checked.
Time and cost
Time is how long each run took from start to finish. Cost is counted in tokens, the small pieces of text (about three quarters of a word each) that an AI model reads and writes. Read is everything the model took in; written is everything it produced.
| Kind of company | Coverage | Time | Read | Written |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-cap clinical-stage immunology, US-listed | 1.000 | 24m 15s | 5.19M | 19k |
| Small-cap clinical-stage oncology, US-listed | 1.000 | 6m 35s | 1.81M | 9k |
| Clinical-stage neuromuscular, no approved products | 1.000 | 10m 15s | 4.48M | 17k |
| Early-commercial, one recently approved product | 1.000 | 22m 07s | 5.52M | 29k |
| Small-cap immuno-oncology, no approved products | 1.000 | 25m 39s | 7.69M | 21k |
| Large-cap commercial, multiple approved products | 0.947 | 23m 50s | 6.13M | 17k |
| Private, pre-clinical, no registry footprint | 0.947 | 8m 58s | 2.25M | 25k |
| Clinical-stage oncology, no approved products | 0.947 | 15m 48s | 6.05M | 33k |
| Clinical-stage neuro, ASX-listed foreign issuer | 0.947 | 20m 32s | 5.84M | 24k |
| Commercial-stage, foreign private issuer (files 20-F) | 0.947 | 18m 46s | 5.56M | 26k |
| Small-cap clinical-stage, one legacy approved product | 0.944 | 14m 47s | 5.40M | 21k |
| All 11 | 0.971 | 191m 32s | 55.92M | 242k |
A run reads roughly 231 times as much as it writes. That is the shape of the work. It reads filings, labels, registry pages and papers, and writes only a checklist and a memo. The reading is the job.
What can still go wrong
- Some companies have less to find. A private company with nothing in trials has almost no public record. A foreign company files a 20-F where the checklist asks for a 10-K. Both of those scored below 0.95.
- Quality checks that files exist, nothing more. A score of 1.000 means every cited file is saved and not empty. It is not a person's review of what the files say.
- Eleven companies is a small test. Each figure is the last scored run for that company, and the page is updated as the test is run again. It is a record of where this stands, not a claim that the work is finished.