Blog
hedwigaihedwigaihedwigai

Biotech diligence · updated 13 September 2026

Biotech due-diligence document gathering: coverage across 11 companies

Before an investor or a partner commits money to a biotech company, someone gathers everything the company has published: investor decks, regulatory filings, drug labels, research papers and clinical trial records. This is part of due diligence, the checking done before a deal. By hand, it falls to an analyst, one search and one download at a time.

We gave this job to an AI research run for 11 biotech companies. Before each run there was a checklist of what should be found, and we scored each run by how much of that checklist it covered.

5 of the 11 runs found everything on the checklist. The other 6 found at least 94%. Every file a run cited was really saved and not empty.

Companies
11
Time, all runs
191m 32s
Text read (tokens)
55.92M
Text written (tokens)
242k

What a research run is

hedwigai makes workbooks: documents such as reports, trackers and lists that AI research runs write and keep current.

A research run is an AI agent given one piece of work, here “gather this company's diligence documents”. It searches the web, opens and reads what it finds, saves the documents, and writes the workbook: a checklist of what it found and a short memo.

The seven kinds of document every run looks for

The checklist is built from the same seven kinds of document for every company.

  1. 01

    Investor presentations

    the decks on the company's own investor page

  2. 02

    Website literature and posters

    every paper and poster the company links from its site

  3. 03

    Annual and quarterly reports (10-K and 10-Q)

    the reports a US-listed company files with the regulator each year and each quarter — or the 20-F and 6-K, which a foreign company files instead

  4. 04

    The company's own drug labels

    the official prescribing information for each approved product, where there is one

  5. 05

    Competitors' drug labels

    the labels for the competing products, and for the treatment doctors use today (the standard of care)

  6. 06

    Published research

    a search of PubMed and Google Scholar for papers on the company's products, and on other products that treat the same disease or work the same way

  7. 07

    Clinical trial registry entries

    every study on the company's products listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, the public registry of clinical trials

How much each run found

Coverage is the share of the checklist a run actually covered, from 0 (nothing) to 1 (everything). The companies are not named. Each is described by its kind, because the kind decides how much there is to find. The dashed line marks 0.95, the score we aim for.

00.250.50.7510.951Mid-cap clinical-stage immunology, US-listed1.0001Small-cap clinical-stage oncology, US-listed1.0001Clinical-stage neuromuscular, no approved products1.0001Early-commercial, one recently approved product1.0001Small-cap immuno-oncology, no approved products1.0006Large-cap commercial, multiple approved products0.9476Private, pre-clinical, no registry footprint0.9476Clinical-stage oncology, no approved products0.9476Clinical-stage neuro, ASX-listed foreign issuer0.9476Commercial-stage, foreign private issuer (files 20-F)0.94711Small-cap clinical-stage, one legacy approved product0.944
  • Average coverage 0.971.
  • 5 of 11 at or above 0.95.
  • Quality 1.000 on every one of the eleven. Quality is a second score: of the files a run says it saved, the share that are really saved and not empty. 260 cited files were checked.

Time and cost

Time is how long each run took from start to finish. Cost is counted in tokens, the small pieces of text (about three quarters of a word each) that an AI model reads and writes. Read is everything the model took in; written is everything it produced.

Kind of companyCoverageTimeReadWritten
Mid-cap clinical-stage immunology, US-listed1.00024m 15s5.19M19k
Small-cap clinical-stage oncology, US-listed1.0006m 35s1.81M9k
Clinical-stage neuromuscular, no approved products1.00010m 15s4.48M17k
Early-commercial, one recently approved product1.00022m 07s5.52M29k
Small-cap immuno-oncology, no approved products1.00025m 39s7.69M21k
Large-cap commercial, multiple approved products0.94723m 50s6.13M17k
Private, pre-clinical, no registry footprint0.9478m 58s2.25M25k
Clinical-stage oncology, no approved products0.94715m 48s6.05M33k
Clinical-stage neuro, ASX-listed foreign issuer0.94720m 32s5.84M24k
Commercial-stage, foreign private issuer (files 20-F)0.94718m 46s5.56M26k
Small-cap clinical-stage, one legacy approved product0.94414m 47s5.40M21k
All 110.971191m 32s55.92M242k

A run reads roughly 231 times as much as it writes. That is the shape of the work. It reads filings, labels, registry pages and papers, and writes only a checklist and a memo. The reading is the job.

What can still go wrong

  • Some companies have less to find. A private company with nothing in trials has almost no public record. A foreign company files a 20-F where the checklist asks for a 10-K. Both of those scored below 0.95.
  • Quality checks that files exist, nothing more. A score of 1.000 means every cited file is saved and not empty. It is not a person's review of what the files say.
  • Eleven companies is a small test. Each figure is the last scored run for that company, and the page is updated as the test is run again. It is a record of where this stands, not a claim that the work is finished.