Blog
hedwigaihedwigaihedwigai

Payments

What people and their agents pay for: x402, Stripe and marketplace data by community

Our last post counted the MCP servers, connectors and skills each community installs. Installing is free. This one follows the money: what each community pays for, and what agents now pay for themselves.

No large tool maker publishes its revenue, and Stripe publishes no figure for money paid to MCP servers. So we read the payments that are public: every x402 payment on chain, Apify’s marketplace, and the revenue small makers verify through Stripe, Polar or Paddle. The short answer: people pay most for data about people (social profiles, leads, places), agents paying for themselves buy model calls and API access, and the communities paying are marketers, sales and creators. Developers install the most, and pay mainly for model calls.

$1.09M

paid by agents over x402 in 30 days, across 2.83M payments

$1.7M

paid to Apify's developers last month, by Apify's account

480k

monthly users of Apify's social-media scrapers, the largest category

What Stripe says

Stripe carried $1.9 trillion in 2025 and says the top AI companies on it reach $1 million in revenue about four months sooner than the top software companies did. It launched payments for agents (machine payments, an agentic commerce suite, a wallet agents can use), but has not said how much flows through them.

Stripe's public figures on AI and agents
FigureWhere
Total payment volume on Stripe, 2025$1.9 trillion, up 34%Annual letter
Top 100 AI companies: months to $1M in annualised revenue11.5 (median), about 4 months ahead of top SaaSIndexing the AI economy
Companies reaching $10M a year within 3 months of launchTwice as many in 2025 as in 2024Annual letter
Claimable Stripe sandboxes created from AI coding tools (Replit, Vercel, Manus, Base44)More than 100,000Annual letter
Link wallet users, now able to pay through an agentMore than 250 millionSessions 2026
What Stripe says about money paid to MCP serversNothing yet: machine payments launched, no volume givenAnnual letter

Three places the money shows

Agent tools are paid for three ways: per request, by the agent itself, over x402; per result, through a marketplace like Apify; and by subscription, the way any software is. The three report different things, so the figures below are not a ranking.

Each rail, as it reports itself, last 30 days
RailWhat is paid forLast 30 daysBasis
x402 (stablecoin, per request)An agent pays an API itself, per call$1.09Mx402scan, every payment on chain
Apify Store (pay per result)Scrapers and agents billed per result$1.7M paid to developersApify's own claim
Subscriptions (TrustMRR)Monthly plans for agent tools$156,718 across 187 OpenClaw startupsVerified by the payment provider

What agents buy with their own money

x402 lets an agent pay for an API call itself, in stablecoins, with no account. In the last 30 days, 36,563 buyers paid 39,175 sellers $1,090,730 in 2,831,358 payments, well under a dollar each.

By count, agents buy model calls and API gateways. By dollars, the top seller is not an agent tool at all: people turning stablecoins into prepaid cards. After that come crypto markets and voice. Sales and marketing data, the leads and social profiles that dominate Apify, is still small here.

Top x402 sellers by dollars, last 30 days (x402scan)
SellerWhat it sellsCommunityPaidPayments
laso.financePrepaid and gift cards bought with stablecoinsEveryday users$272,270221
clusterprotocol.aiCrypto market accessFinance$54,75666,674
dtelecomSpeech-to-text, text-to-speech and callsCreators$36,33416,490
api-xpay.comUtility APIsDevelopers$4,87148,659
blockrun.ai114 models, search and dataDevelopers$3,266411,683
api.venice.aiModel inferenceDevelopers$3,143555
stableenrich.devLead enrichment, Exa, Firecrawl, Google MapsSales$1,19543,757
api.bitrefill.comGift cards, eSIMs and phone top-upsEveryday users$947816
agi.apify.comPrepaid Apify scrapingMarketers and data$625353
socialx402.comTikTok, Instagram, Reddit and LinkedIn dataMarketers$1772,944

What people pay for, one result at a time

Apify sells scrapers and agents by the result, and its store says how many people used each in the last 30 days. Social media and lead generation lead by far: marketers watching Instagram and TikTok, sales teams building lists from Google Maps and LinkedIn. Apify says it paid its developers $1.7 million last month. Of its 852 most popular actors, pay-per-result ones had 27 times the users of free ones.

Apify users in the last 30 days, by category (a person using two actors counts twice)

Social media: 480,019 users in the last 30 daysSocial media480kLead generation: 336,372 users in the last 30 daysLead generation336kAutomation: 162,587 users in the last 30 daysAutomation163kVideo: 123,328 users in the last 30 daysVideo123kAI: 99,042 users in the last 30 daysAI99kDeveloper tools: 60,248 users in the last 30 daysDeveloper tools60kJobs: 58,387 users in the last 30 daysJobs58kSEO: 42,745 users in the last 30 daysSEO43kE-commerce: 34,186 users in the last 30 daysE-commerce34kMCP servers: 2,957 users in the last 30 daysMCP servers3k
The most-used paid actors and what they charge
ActorUsers, 30 daysPrice
Instagram Scraper51,709$0.0027 a result
Google Maps Scraper41,873$0.004 a place
RAG Web Browser32,916$0.00228 a page
Google Search Scraper24,466$0.0045 a page
LinkedIn Profile with email12,834$0.01 a profile

Community by community: verified revenue

TrustMRR lists makers who let it read their revenue straight from their payment provider. It is not a census, since makers choose to list, but every figure is real money. Grouped by who buys:

Agent-tool makers' verified revenue (TrustMRR)
CommunityMakerWhat it sellsProvider30 days12 months
DevelopersLLM GatewayOpen-source gateway to model APIsStripe$259,539$999,309
DevelopersHeadroomCuts Claude Code and Codex token billsPolar$3,068$11,105
DevelopersSkillryA library of agent skills, since August 2026Stripe$7,274$7,382
CreatorsCreativeClawImage, video, audio and 3D models in one MCP serverPolar$107,291$146,702
MarketersSEOBOTAn SEO agent that writes and publishesStripe$37,479$885,884
MarketersSocialcrawlSocial media data API for agentsStripe$33,944$89,241
MarketersAdvanced GSC MCPSearch Console, GA4 and rankings over MCPStripe$4,564$15,392
MarketersOpenTweetX scheduling with an MCP serverPaddle$4,320$25,207
SalesSearch1APIWeb search and crawling for agentsStripe$6,313$21,079
DesignersUX MagicPrompt or screenshot to editable FigmaStripe$6,661$98,470
Office workersMagicSlidesAI slides add-onStripe$8,994$181,913
Financeopenbudget.shBank and brokerage accounts for an agentStripe$3,419$11,418
Ops and securityisMaliciousThreat-intelligence API and MCP serverStripe$1,733$14,947
ResearchersBlainyAI academic writingStripe$1,155$21,511
Everyday usersBrevilabsPersonal context for any agentStripe$25,336$490,550
Everyday usersSetupClawSetting up OpenClawStripe$4,165$44,851
Everyday usersLarryBrainA marketplace of paid OpenClaw skillsStripe$2,424$35,824

One model gateway for developers earns the most. After it, the tools earning most get data or results for marketers, creators and sales, and other developer tools earn when they cut model bills. Selling skills earns little: of four skill directories listed, one had revenue in the last 30 days. Everyday users pay to have OpenClaw set up for them: TrustMRR’s OpenClaw category holds 187 startups and $156,718 in the last 30 days.

The paid tier each community has to buy

Most of the tools in our last post are free to install and paid to use: the agent needs the plan behind the server. These are the cheapest plans that let an agent use each one.

The plan behind each server, from its pricing page
ToolWhat agent use needsSource
Figma MCP (designers)Free in beta, to become usage-based; a Dev seat is $12 a monthfigma.com/pricing
Ahrefs MCP (marketers)Lite plan or above, from $129 a month, and API units per callahrefs.com/pricing
Firecrawl (marketers, data)1,000 free credits, then $16 a monthfirecrawl.dev/pricing
Zapier MCP (sales, office)Each tool call uses a Zapier task; plans from $19.99 a monthzapier.com/pricing
n8n Cloud (sales, office)From €20 a monthn8n.io/pricing
Browserbase (developers)Free with $5 of use, then $20 a monthbrowserbase.com/pricing
Context7 (developers)Free; Pro $10 a seat a monthcontext7.com/plans
Exa (developers, researchers)$10 of free use a month, then pay as you goexa.ai/pricing
ElevenLabs (creators)Free, then $6, $22 or $99 a monthelevenlabs.io/pricing
Remotion (creators)$25 a seat a month, or $0.01 a render with a $100 minimumremotion.pro/license
Claude custom connectors (everyone)One on the free plan; more on a paid plansupport.claude.com

Consumers

People spend on the AI apps themselves. Sensor Tower puts in-app purchases in AI apps on course to pass $4 billion in the first half of 2026, up 36% on the half before, and Claude’s average revenue per US mobile user rose from under $0.50 to $2.76 between September 2025 and May 2026. Nobody breaks that spending down by what the agent is connected to.

Where the evidence is thin

Large makers publish nothing. Firecrawl, Exa, Browserbase, Apify, n8n and ElevenLabs do not show verified revenue anywhere public, so the subscriptions table is small makers only.

x402 totals in the press are inflated. Articles cite 138 million and 200 million payments; a Visa and Artemis analysis put real volume at about $19 million once wash trading is removed. We use x402scan’s last 30 days and leave out sellers whose payments look automated, such as one with 470,969 payments from 151 buyers for $1,071.

Card networks publish pilots, not volumes. Visa, Mastercard, PayPal and Shopify have announced agent checkout, and none has said how much has gone through it.

Our own skills

hedwigai’s skills answer from public records, the way this post was made: web traffic and rankings, leads and hiring, SEC and FDA records, and a reference checker. Reading costs nothing; metered data is billed per call.

npx skills add un-seen/hedwigai-skills

More head-to-head evals

SubQ, jev, Perplexity's Decider and Bespoke's Nimble on biotech diligence memos: finding the sentences a column is aboutFour decision models judge every sentence of ten biotech diligence memos for five columns, scored against sentences a person marked.
MeasureSubQjevDeciderNimble
Found, mean of five columns at section length64%65%66%68%
Mechanism of action, found at section length57%51%61%54%
Read the comparison
Leads with a reason to write: hedwigai ask, Apollo and treg on one brief40 leads each, every one checked: the right person, an inbox that accepts, and a dated reason to write.
MeasureaskApollotreg
Usable leads13 of 407 of 406 of 28
Cost per usable lead$0.037$0.27$0.23
Read the comparison
Self-hosted decisions for ask: Perplexity's open Decider in place of jev on 92 company questionsThe decisions inside hedwigai ask made by Perplexity's open Decider on two NVIDIA RTX 3090s, against jev.
Measureask with jevask with Decider
Questions right, of 928989
Wrong answers12
Read the comparison
Clinical decisions: jev and ask on System One, PubMedQA, SciFact and a 370-decision setEdgeEvals' System One board, PubMedQA, SciFact, and a clinical set built to System One's rules.
Measurejevask
Our 370 clinical decisions, right94.6%93.0%
PubMedQA, right (best EdgeEvals scored: 62.2%)77.0%74.4%
Read the comparison
Executive lookup for US-listed companies: Claude Opus 5.5 and ask on 95 questionsWho runs a public company, and how to email them: a frontier model from memory against hedwigai ask.
MeasureaskClaude Opus 5.5
Questions right, of 955963
Small companies right, of 20139
Read the comparison
Rental comps: floor-plan rents and amenities on 14 listings, five assistants comparedRent per floor plan and amenities for US rentals: hedwigai realestate-us against Claude, GPT, Gemini and Perplexity with web search.
Measurerealestate-usBest of four assistants
Floor-plan rents right, of 262623
Amenities claimed the listing doesn't state12129
Read the comparison
Company screening from SEC filings: jev, Vela 2.0 and ask on 92 yes/no questionsYes-or-no questions about public companies, answered by two decision models alone and by hedwigai ask.
Measureaskjev
Right, of the questions answered98%79%
Wrong answers, of 92219
Read the comparison
Defect localization in industrial images: four frontier models and a trained localizerFour frontier models asked to put a box around what they just described.
MeasureTrained localiserBest of four frontier models
Mean overlap with the defect (IoU, 0 to 1)0.4210.109
Read the comparison